The Question Before the IMF Should Be That It Held Ten Days of Negotiations with The Government in February, For Four Months, the Government Has Given Priority to Politics Over the Economy and Has Not Paid Any Serious Attention to Improving the Economy, why?

The Question Before the IMF Should Be That It Held Ten Days of Negotiations with The Government in February, For Four Months, the Government Has Given Priority to Politics Over the Economy and Has Not Paid Any Serious Attention to Improving the Economy, why?

Mujeeb Khan

 

Isaq Dar, "Pakistan inches closer to unlock IMF loan tranche" since Feb 9,2023

Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, She is seeing in Shahbaz  Sharif's  eyes  how crooked or sincere this person is  

 

 

Prime Minister Imran Khan with IMF Delegation, Pakistan rejects IMF Rs700 billion Budgetary measures

Prime Minister Imran Khan and IMF Managing Director Christina Lagarde

 

  The IMF delegation held talks with Ishaq Dar’s team in Islamabad for ten days in February this year. The IMF can now see for itself what steps this government has taken to improve Pakistan’s economy in four months without waiting for the IMF’s decision. And what measures has the government taken for political stability in Pakistan? And this is a question of political economy, it cannot be that the IMF only gives importance to the economy of Pakistan and ignores the political situation of Pakistan. If the political situation sinks Pakistan, then what will happen to IMF aid? While this government has not accepted any responsibility for 18 months. The bad economy and worse political conditions have been blamed by the government only on Imran Khan. The government is responsible for increasing the revenue for Pakistan, but the government blames Imran Khan for not increasing the revenue. This government has refused to hold provincial elections in two provinces as per the constitution and despite the order of the Supreme Court. IMF officials are going to give billions of dollars to the government of Pakistan, but do they consider this government democratic? And now the government says the elections will be held when Imran Khan is eliminated, and Imran Khan’s party should dismantle or banned. And the government is taking this job from the army chief. The government has suspended the constitution unannounced. Imran Khan’s party leaders were coerced to quit the party or face jail. Fifteen thousand party workers are facing torture in jails. For the first time in the history of Pakistan, the government has jailed thousands of women for supporting Imran Khan, they are being tortured and it is a shame to say that Muslims are raping them because their crime is to support Imran Khan. Nawaz Sharif, the brother of Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, dropped nude pictures of Benazir Bhutto from a plane to people’s homes to win the election in the 90s.

   Army Chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa picked up the Judges of the Supreme Court in the middle of the night and brought them to the court to issue an order to end the government of Imran Khan and give power to these leaders. Under which constitution did General Bajwa do these politics? When the lives of 23 crore people are adversely affected by this decision of an army general, people will raise their voices against the army. The government is also putting them in jails. The government has filed a case against Imran Khan on fresh charges of inciting people against the army. The army chief ends Imran Khan’s government by conspiring with the opposition leaders, and now the government that the army brought to power is making a case against Imran Khan for speaking against it.

  The government has been doing these dirty politics for four months, and the government has not done anything to improve the economy.  Just waiting for IMF aid, looking towards China and Saudi Arabia. Before giving aid to such a government, the IMF would have to change its banking rules. The government is not trustworthy.

                     

While President Zelensky Was Urging a Peaceful Resolution of The Conflict with Russia Through Diplomatic Dialogue Before Launching a War in Ukraine, Zelensky Made It a Point to Listen to The United States And NATO, Now Zelensky Faces the Consequences of The War

While President Zelensky Was Urging a Peaceful Resolution of The Conflict with Russia Through Diplomatic Dialogue Before Launching a War in Ukraine, Zelensky Made It a Point to Listen to The United States And NATO, Now Zelensky Faces the Consequences of The War

Mujeeb Khan

 

Zelensky ' Some' Arab leaders turn 'Blind Eye' to the Russian invasion

France and Germany pressured African Union leaders for months to join a brief Zoom call with  Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. 51 of 55 African heads of State boycotted the meeting, showing clear neutrality over the Western proxy war with Russia 

   Fifteen months after the Ukraine war, President Volodymyr Zelensky is going to different countries of the world for help. Ukraine is in desperate need of funds to run the government. Europe is becoming economically burst from the long war and this is the case with the United States. The United States had previously paid $60 billion to pay the salaries of the Ukrainian government’s employees. The European Union gave about 150 billion euros. This time they sent President Zelensky to the Arabs, a conference of heads of the Arab League was taking place in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and President Zelensky came specially to address it. President Zelensky urged Arab leaders to Support his peace initiative to end Russia’s war in Ukraine. I invite all of you who respect peace to participate in the implementation of the peace formula so that enmity, wars, suffering, and evil end, wars spread evil. When President Zelensky was dragged along by NATO, President Zelensky was listening to NATO’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

  Secretary General NATO’s mission was not peace. The Secretary-General was the salesperson of the war machine. The war machine of NATO countries has sold trillions of dollars of weapons in the fifteen-month war in Ukraine. President Biden has just announced $379 million worth of weapons to Ukraine, after meeting with President Zelensky during a G7 conference in Tokyo. A long war in Ukraine is in America’s interest, capital will come to America from Europe, and this process has already started. Some German companies are investing in America, and others have gone to China. Investors will not wait for the war to end. The effects of the Ukraine war felt on the economy of Europe.

  Surprisingly, how President Zelensky has come into the trap of NATO, he saw that NATO had fought a war in Afghanistan with the Taliban for twenty years. Afghanistan was one of the poorest countries in the world. The Taliban did not have modern weapons. NATO compared to them was 100% strong. But NATO could not defeat the Taliban in twenty years. How could NATO fight Russia, which is a nuclear power? Then President Zelensky did not even see that the wars had changed Iraq, Libya, and Syria, human destructions in these countries were horrible, and these countries were becoming rubles. And in the end, NATO left them in ruins. Instead of learning a lesson from these countries, President Zelensky had taken it over. Zelensky ignored this and accepted NATO’s role as a proxy in the war. Secretary General Stoltenberg has gone into the background of the Ukraine war to keep NATO countries busy.

  In the US, Republicans have a majority in Congress, and they are not interested in the Ukraine war, next year there will be a presidential election in the United States and the administrative machine of the United States will be busy with the election campaign. President Zelensky will now have to face the situation by himself. The disaster that was supposed to happen in Ukraine has happened.

               

Saudi Arabia’s Good Initiative Restored Diplomatic Relations in The Region, Making West Asia Like East Asia, Stop Buying Weapons, Abolishing All Military Bases in The Region, and Promoting Economic Development, and Trade, this is The Future of the 21st Century.

Saudi Arabia’s Good Initiative Restored Diplomatic Relations in The Region, Making West Asia Like East Asia, Stop Buying Weapons, Abolishing All Military Bases in The Region, and Promoting Economic Development, and Trade, this is The Future of the 21^st Century.

Mujeeb Khan

 

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdullah, Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister, and Chinese Foreign Minister QinGang during their meeting in Beijing, China, April6, 2023

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan in Syria, President Bashar al-Assad 

   

  In the Holy Land, God sent the President of China. The President of China came to Saudi Arabia and gave a message of peace to the King and left. The message was to bring peace to God’s servants before coming to Allah. The Saudis welcomed the Iranians and vowed to live in peace with them. In response, Iran pledged the survival and security of the Saudi Kingdom and emphasized the importance of good relations and promoting mutual trade between the two countries. Saudi King Salman has invited Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi to visit Saudi Arabia. After Iran, Saudi Arabia announced the restoration of relations with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and the restoration of Syria’s membership in the Arab League. Peaceful countries of the world have welcomed the decision of the Saudi government. The Saudi Foreign Minister went to Damascus and personally informed President Assad of his government’s decision to restore diplomatic relations with Syria. After Saudi Arabia, Gulf States have also restored relations with Syria and welcomed its return to the Arab League. The Syrian army has fought bravely for the survival of its country. Therefore, it said that there can be no war in the Middle East without Syria and there can be no peace in the Middle East without Egypt.

  America and the West have destroyed those countries in the Middle East that were the cradle of civilization, whose people educated, doctors, engineers, scientists, and intellectuals. Shias, Sunnis, and Christians lived here for thousands of years. They are all Arabs first and religion was secondary. Saddam Hussein was a dictator, but he developed Iraq. This was also acknowledged by the ambassador of America to Iraq. Schools, colleges, universities, hospitals, roads, and highways were built in Iraq. Chief of Army General Tommy Frank, who planned the invasion of Iraq, said that Iraq is a wealthy country with a prosperous middle class, people educated, and Iraq will develop very quickly. But twenty years after the invasion of Iraq, Iraq has not yet returned to the position it was in before the US invasion. Today Iraq is not wealthy, people are poorer today. It has been 30 years behind in education. This is exactly what happened in Syria and Libya. These countries were also economically prosperous, educated societies. But these countries were destroyed for no reason. Destruction of humanity is the worst violation of human rights.

  In the second decade of the 21^st century, Arab rulers have come to their senses after meeting with Chinese leaders, ending differences and making Meddle East a United Economic Union. And they give importance to close relationships with each other. Restoring relations between Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries with Iran is a good decision, it will promote peace, stability, and economic development in the region. This region will be a market of four hundred million people. West Asia will be like East Asia.

  This region no longer needs weapons. Over sixty years, weapons and military bases have sold wars and produced devastation, and destruction in the region. Military bases were abolished, and naval bases were replaced by trading shipping bases. NATO is talking about establishing cooperative relations with GCC countries. It is an organization of imperial and colonial powers, and in the 21^st century, the military presence on the territory of independent nations will be a symbol of the survival of colonialism.

  

                                                                         

The End of The Cold War Did Not Bring Peace in the World, Arms and Wars Replaced the Cold War

The End of The Cold War Did Not Bring Peace in the World, Arms and Wars Replaced the Cold War

Mujeeb Khan

 

  The decision to end the Cold War was indeed wrong. The world is a more dangerous place today than it was during the Cold War. President Biden has said that democracy is in danger. Democracy was also at risk during the Cold War, this situation has not changed. Since the end of the Cold War, bloody wars have increased dramatically. Record-breaking human destruction has occurred. The countries that were in the Western Bloc in the Cold War were the biggest losers. And Pakistan, which was on the front line in the Cold War, is standing on the front line as a loser. After the end of the Cold War, weapons production increased and new weapons were invented, including drones. Then wars were invented to use these weapons. All the wars that have been fought since the end of the Cold War just to keep the arms companies in business. The second Iraq War started in 2003 and ended in 2012. A trillion dollars were spent on this war. The Afghan war started in 2001 and this war ended 20 years later in 2021. That is, after the end of the Cold War, the world was kept at war for 30 years. While during these wars, war was fought in the name of regime change in Libya and Syria. And the battle is not over yet. Syria and Libya have been stuck in a state of war for eleven years. They have not yet been blessed with peace. The war against al-Qaeda in Yemen, which was launched by President George W. Bush was handed over to President Obama eight years later. President Obama continued the war against al-Qaeda for another eight years. And when President Obama’s eight years of tenure were completed, President Obama handed over the Yemen war to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf allies. These Gulf Arab countries fought a war with Yemen for 7 years. These Gulf Arab people had never fought such a long war in their history. These Arab countries used to buy billions of dollars worth of arms from the United States, Great Britain, and France to fight and win the war against Yemen. After all, President Biden ended the war in Yemen. The war in Yemen was over. US and NATO troops had left Afghanistan. The world breathed a sigh of relief. After five months, a new war was started in Europe against the country that ended the Cold War for peace in the world. And it was a NATO-US proxy war between Russia and Ukraine.

  If the world knew the lack of interest of the United States and NATO countries in world peace, the world would never actively participate in ending the Cold War. What have peace-loving countries gained from the end of the Cold War? In the reports that have come on the increasing military spending in the world, it is stated that the United States has spent 877 billion dollars on its military in 2022, which accounts for 40 percent of all spending. The United States spend 76.4 billion dollars on education in 2022. The report said that the world’s governments had never spent as much on the military as is being spent now, and the United States is top of the list. In 2022, governments spent about 2.24 trillion dollars on the military, which is an increase of 3.7% compared to 2021. This is the biggest increase in more than 30 years.

  China’s defense spending is $292 billion, an increase of 4.2 percent compared to last year. Russia is spending $86.4 billion on its defense, an increase of 9.2 percent due to the war in Ukraine. India is spending $81.4 billion on its defense, and it has increased by six percent.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

The Dollar’s Future: Multilateral World, Multilateral Currency

The Dollar’s Future: Multilateral World, Multilateral Currency

 Mujeeb Khan

 

 

French Protesters at NATO Summit

Unions call for protests in France over the high prices and pension

  After World War II, the United States Marshall Plan rebuilt the war-torn countries of Europe in a truly brief period, and they became industrialized countries in the 1960s. for seventy years, these countries had complete dominance over the world economy. The world financial institutions were under their control. They had a monopoly on commerce and trade. Now Ukraine war in the middle of Europe is rolling back 70 years of economic growth and prosperity in Europe. America is $31 trillion in debt, and by 2030 it will increase to nineteen trillion dollars. America will be the indebted superpower of the world. And Pakistan will be the most indebted nuclear power in the world. Both countries will be sitting on the branch of the fallen leaf tree and will look envious at the economic prosperity of those who do not owe anyone. However, the effects of the Ukraine war are now felt in Europe’s economy. Russia was a major trading partner of the European Union. By isolating a major trading partner, European countries have harmed their economies. European leaders and the United States believed that Russia would not be able to withstand its severe economic sanctions and would soon compromise on a ceasefire. But the Ukraine war has now entered its second year. Surprisingly, European countries have opened a war front with nuclear power in Europe. Russia has thousands of nuclear weapons. For Ukraine, Europe has made its enemy, but it will not go to war with Russia.

 Europe’s leaders are particularly nervous about where the war in Ukraine will take them. In Europe, public anxiety about the war in Ukraine is increasing. Inflated cost of living and unemployment are the effects of this war that the people will face. There are protests in France over raising the retirement age and the pension issue. There is a protest in London over the rising cost of living. Germany, one of the largest economies in Europe, is shrinking. German companies are moving to China, according to reports from trade research institutes in Europe, 58,000 companies will go bankrupt in France by the end of this year. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said that “the hegemony of the dollar threatened by US sanctions on Russia. Russia and Iran are looking to replace the dollar and China’s currency the yuan is gaining ground against the US dollar. And this is one of China’s it has long been ambitious to have its currency recognized in global trade. The US’s restrictive sanctions policy has opened the door to trade in more than one currency.

  Saudi Arabia and the oil-producing countries of the Gulf have also announced to trade in Chinese currency. Iran is already trading with China and Russia in their currency. Brazil and Argentina have decided to trade in their own currency. India has announced that countries that cannot afford the dollar due to its high price can use Indian currency. On the other hand, the trade between European Union countries is in Euro. The trend to gain independence from the dollar-dominated world is growing. Trade in the region and among regional countries in local currency is promoted. In addition to US sanctions, there is pressure on the dollar from the increasing debts of the US.

 Today, Saudi Arabia and Gulf countries are talking about payment of their oil in other currencies, after the first Gulf War, Iraq’s President Saddam Hussein refused to accept the payment of his oil in dollars. After him, Libyan President Gaddafi also refused to receive oil payments in dollars. They were such visionary leaders that they knew that one day the oil-producing countries would have to make this decision.