Palestine: Islamic Countries Should Urge the United States to Do More for a Two-State Solution

Palestine: Islamic Countries Should Urge the United States to Do More for a Two-State Solution

Mujeeb Khan

 

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas welcomes President Joe Biden in Bethlehem in the Israeli-occupied West Bank

Israeli Police clash with Palestinians in al-Aqsa mosque, 17 April 2022

  It has become a tradition for every American president that the first foreign visit after becoming president is to the Middle East, but President Biden made this trip eighteen months after becoming president. It will reassure the Arab rulers that America is their closest ally. This region is of special importance for the US. The US will defend its strategic interests here. Then the President goes to Israel, where they say to the Israeli government that America will defend Israel. With Israel’s approval, the president then goes to Ramallah to offer his sympathy to the Palestinian Authority for not yet having an independent state. Then convince them that two-state is the only solution to the problem. But then the problem is that in Israel they say America will defend Israel. This means that the US will also defend the occupied Palestinian land by Israel. When President Biden and President Mahmoud Abbas were walking together, both are about 80 years old, and President Biden told Mahmoud Abbas and Mahmoud Abbas told President Biden that two-state is the solution to their problem. President Biden has been talking about a two-state solution to the Palestinians, all his life, and Mahmoud Abbas used to hear this from every president of the United States throughout his life that two-state is the only solution to the problem, but it has never been fulfilled this promise.

 Leaders of Islamic countries said that the Palestine issue would resolve after the end of the Cold War. Then it said that the Palestine problem will be solved after Saddam Hussein’s problem is solved. Saddam Hussein is a major obstacle in solving this issue. Then it said that the Palestinians would have to bring in new leadership. Yasir Arafat had gone, and Mahmoud Abbas came with the new leadership of the Palestinians. The US kept the Palestinians on the sidelines of the two-state solution and allowed Israel to build new Jewish settlements between Palestinian territories. During this period, Israel settled half a million Jewish settlements in the deep Palestinian territories. Clashes between Jewish settlers in the midst of a dense Palestinian population are a major problem. In the media, it is described as Palestinians' attacks on Israeli Jews. The Arabs were engaged in the war against terrorism, the war in Iraq, the war in Syria, the war in Libya, and the war in Yemen against Al Qaeda. On the one hand, the Arabs were engaged in these wars, and on the other hand, Iran threatened the Arab rulers. Thirdly, the Middle East is divided into a Shia-Sunni tussle. It was US-Israel propaganda that Iran’s influence was increasing in the Middle East. Arab rulers in the Middle East were under the influence of America. In this case, the Iranian influence would have challenged the American influence in the Middle East. For six years it said that Iran was helping the Houthis in the war with Saudi Arabia, but America made a cease-fire within hours. And there has been silence in front of Saudi Arabia and Yemen for two months. Iran is in its place within its borders. Iran has not occupied even an inch of anyone’s land. Iran has repeatedly called for a ban on lethal weapons, including nuclear weapons, in the Middle East. But America, Europe, and Israel do not consider this demand of Iran to be in their interest. Their only insistence is to prevent Iran from going nuclear, and the arms trade will continue in the Middle East.

 Trying to isolate Iran in the Middle East was not possible. For stability in the Middle East, the Arab countries considered it necessary to join Iran. In this regard, they have also made some progress in the dialogues with Iran. In the current situation of the world, the regional countries must make a policy to solve the problems of the region in the region. Now Arab Islamic countries are pressured to recognize Israel and establish diplomatic relations with it. Islamic countries that were close allies of America in the Cold War, for fifty years have been pushing America to resolve the Palestinian conflict. After the 1973 Arab-Israel war, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto pleaded with President Nixon at the White House to please resolve the Palestinian issue, it will become a major threat to world peace and stability. After 9/11, Malaysian President Mahathir Mohammad asked President George Bush to resolve the Palestinian conflict. Pakistan’s President General Pervez Musharraf and other leaders of Islamic countries also urged President Bush to resolve the Palestinian conflict, but no American president had listened to Islamic countries. They kept the Palestine conflict alive. President Biden made promises in his recent meeting with Palestinian leaders. But this is only to the extent of words and promises. There is nothing to happen, what Israel wants will happen?

    

   

     

Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Hostility Toward President Trump, Investigations, and Two Impeachments, resulted in a Setback in the Supreme Court Appointments of Three Ideological Conservative Judges, Now Court Tilt to the Right

  

Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Hostility Toward President Trump, Investigations, and Two Impeachments, resulted in a Setback in the Supreme Court Appointments of Three Ideological Conservative Judges, Now Court Tilt to the Right

Mujeeb Khan

Speaker Nancy Pelosi rips up President Trump's State of the Union speech

  

House impeachment managers with Speaker Nancy Pelosi

 

Insurrectionists Stormed the US Capitol building on January 6th, 2021 

  During the 2016 presidential election campaign, an American asked me for whom I would vote. Instead of answering him, I asked him for whom will he vote. He said he will vote for Donald Trump. I am Catholic and Trump will end abortion. I told him Trump is not a conservative. Trump is a New Yorker liberal. This American said Trump will end abortion. I emphasized making history in America by electing the first woman president. The alliance of Christian Evangelicals, Anti Abortionists, and Israeli Hawkish elected Donald Trump as President. Donald Trump did not have a political ideology, but the partnership of the three had a political agenda. And it is not hidden from anyone. The Democratic Party has made a fatal blunder by adopting a strategy of harshly opposing President Trump. This strategy of the Democrats kept President Trump in his political base instead of coming out of his political base and allowed President Trump to implement his political base's agenda. The Democrats’ confrontation with the Trump administration was the wrong decision. Confrontational politics never achieve goals. Democrats wasted time on an investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election and then two impeachments. The Democrats did not gain anything from this, but the political division in  the United States increased. Democrats focused more on investigations and impeachment. While President Trump’s political base focused on changing the Supreme Court. President Trump has placed a highly ideological conservative on the Supreme Court and has appointed more than two hundred federal judges. The map of the Supreme Court and Federal Courts has changed. These are lifetime appointments.

 Protecting the Supreme Court from the dominance of ideological conservatives -- more than Donald Trump – was crucial. Just as the Democrats embraced election rigging in 2000, and George W. Bush was accepted as president. Donald Trump was not elected by fraud; he was elected by the votes of the American people. Talk of Russian meddling was unnecessary. Democrats should have accepted open-minded Donald Trump as president. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic leaders in Congress should have engaged with President Trump. President Trump’s foreign policy, national security policy, economic policy, etc. could be changed but judges in the Supreme Court cannot be changed. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic leaders in the Senate, along with moderate Republican senators, would have tried to ensure that the Supreme Court did not tilt toward ideological conservatives. President Trump is not such a bad person. They listen to everyone. They are very flexible. If the moderate Republicans in the Senate, including women, were to recommend a moderate to the Supreme Court, President Trump would certainly consider it important, and maintain the status quo on the Supreme Court.       

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Globalization Versus Militarization: The United States Expanding NATO, Destroys Globalization and Imposes Militarization on the World

Globalization Versus Militarization: The United States Expanding NATO, Destroys Globalization and Imposes Militarization on the World

Mujeeb Khan

 

 

Protests against NATO Summit in Spain

Thousands of people gather in Madrid to oppose increased military spending by NATO members while calling for US troops to withdraw from Europe  

 The United Nations should tell the Pacific Nations that war offender NATO is moving into their neighborhood. NATO is on a march to militarize the world. NATO has militarized Europe. Thousands of US troops are heading to Eastern Europe. The Persian Gulf is already under the military control of the United States, Britain, and France. It is unfortunate for the people of Eastern Europe that they have become prisoners of the NATO military pact since independence from the Warsaw military pact. NATO has never been as active in the world during the Cold War as NATO is active in the post-Cold War world. Right after the end of the Cold War, it planned to expand NATO first to Eastern Europe, then to North Africa, then to East Asia, then to South America. The world is divided into globalization versus militarization. The problem for the West is that globalization has taken the world out of its influence. The new economic bloc is making the military bloc unpopular.

  Asia, Africa, and Latin America are more interested in economic development. During the Cold War, these countries wasted decades of ideological warfare, and they do not want to go back to the past decades, seeing the lack of interest in the wars of these countries, the United States started the politics of sanctioning regimes. The US economic sanctions are gradually dismantling globalizing. The US Congress passed its separate law imposing economic sanctions on various countries in the world. The United States had experienced severe setbacks in the wars in Vietnam, Korea, and Cambodia, but despite this experience, the United States, along with NATO, had fought a 20-year war in Afghanistan against the Taliban but failed and had to leave Afghanistan. This was the first humiliating defeat for NATO countries in Afghanistan. The question is, what was the purpose of the NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and the Biden administration in just six months to bring the world closer to World War III?

  The briefings given by NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and the Biden administration to NATO countries and the world on the Ukraine war have proved wrong. NATO has misled the world about the situation in Ukraine. The United States and NATO have put President Zelensky on a dead-end in Ukraine. It has been five months since the war, Ukraine is devasted, Ukraine’s economy has collapsed, and the lives of Ukrainians have been ruined. The way United States trained 400,000 Afghan Army in Afghanistan, gave them weapons, and then the US said with great confidence that the Afghan army was able to fight the Taliban. But then the world saw that with the withdrawal of American troops, the Afghan military flew away from Afghanistan like a flock of birds. Something similar has happened in Ukraine. The United States has trained the Ukrainian military, the best weapons given to it. The Biden administration has said with confidence that Ukraine’s military is stronger today than it was in 2014 and that it is capable of fighting Russia. But the United States and NATO have entirely ignored the fact that a larger number of Ukrainians live in Russia, and they are against the government of Ukraine. The Russians who were citizens of Ukraine were pro-Russians. The United States and NATO have trained Ukraine’s military and pushed it to fight Russia. But they had no idea who was fighting whom in Ukraine? The United States did not care in whose hands its weapons would reach. The United States aims to sell weapons as possible. The President of Ukraine is an idiot, he is surrounded by a war mafia. 

Senator Charles Schumer Says Shahbaz Sharif Will Improve Relations with The United States, Shahbaz Sharif on Bail Money Laundering and Corruption Cases Against Him in Court, Shahbaz Sharif says Senator Schumer Will Help Him End the Corruption cases

Senator Charles Schumer Says Shahbaz Sharif Will Improve Relations with The United States, Shahbaz Sharif on Bail Money Laundering and Corruption Cases Against Him in Court, Shahbaz Sharif says Senator Schumer Will Help Him End the Corruption cases

 

The question of the people of Pakistan to Senator Schumer is that if a senator is on bail and money laundering and corruption cases are in court against him, can he become the chairperson of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee?

Mujeeb Khan

 

 

 

  Senator Charles Schumer’s remarks on the political situation in Pakistan that former Prime Minister Imran Khan has spoken against the United States and has damaged relations with the United States. Senator Schumer also expressed confidence in Shahbaz Sharif to improve relations with the United States. this shows that Senator Schumer was unaware of Pakistan’s politics. It is completely wrong to accuse Imran Khan anti-US if anyone has an opinion about Islam and it is wrong to say that he has spoken against Islam. Some of the same views expressed by President Putin when Donald Trump became president hope that President Trump will improve US-Russia relations. Hillary Clinton was angry that she lost the election because of Russia’s meddling in the elections. Imran Khan is a human being like Hillary Clinton, he was also angry that his government has overthrown because of US meddling. While Pakistan has a history of overthrowing democratic governments from external and internal intrigue.

 The Obama administration’s plot to oust President Erdogan failed. President Erdogan was cooperating with Russia in Syria, and despite strong opposition from the United States, President Erdogan was buying missile defense systems from Russia. Turkey was a member of NATO, and the Obama administration was not happy with the Erdogan government’s deal with Russia. Is this the policy of the United States to establish control over the sovereignty of Islamic countries? To whom do Islamic countries have relations? Who not to trade with? Why did Imran Khan go to Moscow? Pakistan is now 75 years old. He is 4 years younger than President Biden. Pakistan does not need to hold America’s finger. It is unfortunate for Pakistan that its leaders are 75 years old but not yet mature. They are still in the habit of holding America’s finger.

  It is wrong to say that relations with the United States have deteriorated under former Prime Minister Imran Khan. The fact is that under former President Obama, US relations with Pakistan strained. Under President Trump, Pakistan had the best relations with the United States in our lives. After Imran Khan became the Prime Minister, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary James Mattis were the first high-ranking foreign officials to visit Islamabad to meet the Prime Minister. The Trump administration wanted to end the Afghan war, and they needed Pakistan’s help to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table. Prime Minister Imran Khan had presented to the US delegation the treatment meted out to the previous administration in the war on terror. The conversation was incredibly open. There was a better understanding of each other. President Trump was a businessperson and he wanted business, not politics. President Trump’s cordial meetings with Prime Minister Imran Khan brought the United States closer to Pakistan. Mutual relations were on Mutual profit.

  Trump administration prevented India from interfering in Pakistan’s efforts to end the war in Afghanistan. In this regard, the Secretary of state, Secretary of Defense, and Chief of Army Staff had gone to Delhi. They told the Indian government that President Trump wanted to end the Afghan war and did not want to see any interference in talks with the Taliban. India did not intervene, Pakistan made efforts, and the Trump administration reached a ceasefire agreement with the Taliban.

  In the history of US-Pakistan relations, the Trump administration has not interfered in Pakistan’s domestic politics. President Trump has not confronted Pakistan’s corrupt leaders. So, these corrupt leaders kept jumping into Pakistan, they did not get any help from outside. But the corrupt leaders of Pakistan saw that the traditional leadership has come in the White House which has always supported the corrupt leaders in the Third World. The blood flowed in the veins of their body. The Biden administration was quick to help bring corrupt leaders to power. This is the tragedy of democracy, the tragedy of the rule of law, and a transparent government is the talking point of America’s leaders.