America’s Role in the Arab Rulers’ Region- From Mohammed Morsi in Egypt to Ahmed Al-Sharaa in Syria, why was Mohammed Morsi bad? Why is Ahmed Al-Sharaa Good in Syria? Chairman Yasser Arafat recognized the Existence of Israel, Shook Hands with Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, and Chairman Yasser Arafat made the Most Visits to President Clinton’s White House. President George Bush Called Chairman Yasser Arafat a Global Terrorist. Was This Policy Behavior of America to Keep the Bloodshed in the Middle East?

  

America’s Role in the Arab Rulers’ Region- From Mohammed Morsi in Egypt to Ahmed Al-Sharaa in Syria, why was Mohammed Morsi bad? Why is Ahmed Al-Sharaa Good in Syria? Chairman Yasser Arafat recognized the Existence of Israel, Shook Hands with Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, and Chairman Yasser Arafat made the Most Visits to President Clinton’s White House. President George Bush Called Chairman Yasser Arafat a Global Terrorist. Was This Policy Behavior of America to Keep the Bloodshed in the Middle East? 

Mujeeb Khan 

 

 

   The Bush administration destroyed the status quo in the Middle East under the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq by preemptively invading Iraq was in the interest of Israel, by removing Saddam Hussein from power. The path was paved for Israel to advance its aggressive policies in the Middle East. What did Israel gain by destroying the status quo in the Middle East, and what did the Arabs gain? What harm did America’s interests in the Middle East suffer? The 9/11 attack on America is still a mystery, but the US has caused the most destruction in the Middle East. Saddam Hussein, Muammer Gaddafi, and Bashar al-Assad were not religious extremists; they were socialist, Arab nationalists, and secular who had been facing attacks by Islamic extremists for fifty years. At that time, these Islamic extremists were in America’s good books. President George W Bush and his national security advisor, Condoleezza Rice, knew nothing about the Middle East except Israel. Similarly, President Obama was blank on the history of the Middle East. President Bush, President Obama, and President Biden’s views on the Middle East. President Bush, President Obama, and President Biden’s national security and foreign advisors on the Middle East were pro-Israel and agreed with the views of pro-Netanyahu. The United States was where it was before the regime change in Iraq; the United States is still there after the regime change, and there has been no change in the United States’ Middle East policy.  

   President Bush and Condoleezza Rice, pro-Israel, were heavily influenced by Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu, who refused to review the Oslo peace accords and the progress President Clinton had made towards peace between the Palestinians and Israel, and an independent Palestinian state. Chairman Yasser Arafat and Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin had recognized each other’s existence, and the PLO had removed the clauses calling for the destruction of Israel from its charter. Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Chairman Yasser Arafat, and Shimon Peres were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. No world leader had visited President Clinton’s White House as often as Chairman Yasser Arafat did. President Bush, in a fit of rage with Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon, called Chairman Arafat a global terrorist. And this was America’s Middle East policy.

  If President Bush had continued the Oslo Peace Process, the Middle East would have been the most peaceful region in the world today. President Bush’s team had brought its own agenda; warmongers would establish institutes of war in the Middle East. With the Iraq war, President Bush laid the foundation for new wars in the Middle East. He took the war from Afghanistan to Iraq and the Middle East. President Bush did not make Iraq Germany or Japan during his eight years in power, nor did the people of Iraq get peace, freedom, and democracy. One hundred thousand Iraqi citizens would have been killed in a preemptive of America. More than one hundred thousand Iraqis would have been displaced. The question is what the countries of the region got from the Iraq war and what the United States achieved. If President Bush had continued the Oslo peace process where President Clinton had left off, every country in the region would have achieved peace. stability, and new opportunities for economic development would have come to the region.

   A bigger blender than President Bush’s blender in Iraq was the blender that America’s first black president, Obama, had in Libya, Syria. These countries were never religious extremists. Rather, they were under the attacks of religious extremists during the US Cold War. The Obama-Biden administration spent $500 million on a project to transform the Middle East into freedom and democracy. The Arab Spring was the first historic movement for freedom and democracy in the Middle East. This movement began in Tunisia, where the authoritarian era ended and the first democratically elected government came to power. For the first time in Egypt’s 1,000-year history, the Egyptian people voted for a non-military government. It was crystal clear that religious parties would come to power whenever elections were held in the Middle East in these countries. Because nationalist socialist governments had been in power in these countries for a long time. In Egypt, Mohamed Morsi’s Brotherhood Party won the elections with 60 percent of the vote, and they came to power. Israel’s idiot ruler, Benjamin Netanyahu, said that Israel is being surrounded by Islamists from all sides when Mohamed Morsi came to power in Egypt; the fact was that Israel was the only non-Islamic country among the Arab Islamic Middle East.

  The positive long-term effects of a democratic government in Egypt would have been far more significant than the negative effects of a military government in Egypt. There would never have been an October 7^th uprising against Israel, there would never have been any genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, and there would have been no missile attacks on Israel from Yemeni Houthis. Hamas and Hezbollah would have remained in the orbit of a democratic government in Egypt. Iran would not have had any influence on them. Democracy always has positive benefits, because the US does not see the positive outcomes of democracy in its own interests; the US crushes democracy in these countries. The Obama-Biden administration, showing weakness on its democratic values in Egypt, surrendered democracy in Egypt to the idiot Netanyahu. America should have defended its core democratic values in Egypt at all costs.