America’s Role in the Arab Rulers’ Region- From Mohammed
Morsi in Egypt to Ahmed Al-Sharaa in Syria, why was Mohammed Morsi bad? Why is Ahmed
Al-Sharaa Good in Syria? Chairman Yasser Arafat recognized the Existence of
Israel, Shook Hands with Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, and Chairman Yasser Arafat made the Most Visits to President Clinton’s White House. President
George Bush Called Chairman Yasser Arafat a Global Terrorist. Was This Policy
Behavior of America to Keep the Bloodshed in the Middle East?
Mujeeb Khan
.jpg)
The Bush administration
destroyed the status quo in the Middle East under the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq
by preemptively invading Iraq was in the interest of Israel, by removing Saddam
Hussein from power. The path was paved for Israel to advance its aggressive policies
in the Middle East. What did Israel gain by destroying the status quo in the Middle
East, and what did the Arabs gain? What harm did America’s interests in the Middle
East suffer? The 9/11 attack on America is still a mystery, but the US has
caused the most destruction in the Middle East. Saddam Hussein, Muammer
Gaddafi, and Bashar al-Assad were not religious extremists; they were socialist,
Arab nationalists, and secular who had been facing attacks by Islamic
extremists for fifty years. At that time, these Islamic extremists were in
America’s good books. President George W Bush and his national security
advisor, Condoleezza Rice, knew nothing about the Middle East except Israel.
Similarly, President Obama was blank on the history of the Middle East.
President Bush, President Obama, and President Biden’s views on the Middle East.
President Bush, President Obama, and President Biden’s national security and
foreign advisors on the Middle East were pro-Israel and agreed with the views
of pro-Netanyahu. The United States was where it was before the regime change
in Iraq; the United States is still there after the regime change, and there has
been no change in the United States’ Middle East policy.
President Bush and
Condoleezza Rice, pro-Israel, were heavily influenced by Ariel Sharon and Benjamin
Netanyahu, who refused to review the Oslo peace accords and the progress
President Clinton had made towards peace between the Palestinians and Israel,
and an independent Palestinian state. Chairman Yasser Arafat and Prime Minister
Yitzhak Rabin had recognized each other’s existence, and the PLO had removed
the clauses calling for the destruction of Israel from its charter. Prime
Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Chairman Yasser Arafat, and Shimon Peres were awarded
the Nobel Peace Prize. No world leader had visited President Clinton’s White
House as often as Chairman Yasser Arafat did. President Bush, in a fit of rage
with Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon, called Chairman Arafat a global terrorist. And this
was America’s Middle East policy.
If President Bush
had continued the Oslo Peace Process, the Middle East would have been the most
peaceful region in the world today. President Bush’s team had brought its own agenda;
warmongers would establish institutes of war in the Middle East. With the Iraq
war, President Bush laid the foundation for new wars in the Middle East. He
took the war from Afghanistan to Iraq and the Middle East. President Bush did
not make Iraq Germany or Japan during his eight years in power, nor did the
people of Iraq get peace, freedom, and democracy. One hundred thousand Iraqi
citizens would have been killed in a preemptive of America. More than one hundred
thousand Iraqis would have been displaced. The question is what the countries
of the region got from the Iraq war and what the United States achieved. If President
Bush had continued the Oslo peace process where President Clinton had left off,
every country in the region would have achieved peace. stability, and new
opportunities for economic development would have come to the region.
A bigger blender
than President Bush’s blender in Iraq was the blender that America’s first
black president, Obama, had in Libya, Syria. These countries were never religious
extremists. Rather, they were under the attacks of religious extremists during
the US Cold War. The Obama-Biden administration spent $500 million on a project
to transform the Middle East into freedom and democracy. The Arab Spring was
the first historic movement for freedom and democracy in the Middle East. This movement
began in Tunisia, where the authoritarian era ended and the first democratically
elected government came to power. For the first time in Egypt’s 1,000-year history,
the Egyptian people voted for a non-military government. It was crystal clear that
religious parties would come to power whenever elections were held in the Middle East in these countries. Because nationalist socialist governments had
been in power in these countries for a long time. In Egypt, Mohamed Morsi’s
Brotherhood Party won the elections with 60 percent of the vote, and they came
to power. Israel’s idiot ruler, Benjamin Netanyahu, said that Israel is being
surrounded by Islamists from all sides when Mohamed Morsi came to power in
Egypt; the fact was that Israel was the only non-Islamic country among the Arab Islamic
Middle East.
The positive
long-term effects of a democratic government in Egypt would have been far more
significant than the negative effects of a military government in Egypt. There
would never have been an October 7th uprising against Israel, there
would never have been any genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, and there would have
been no missile attacks on Israel from Yemeni Houthis. Hamas and Hezbollah
would have remained in the orbit of a democratic government in Egypt. Iran
would not have had any influence on them. Democracy always has positive benefits,
because the US does not see the positive outcomes of democracy in its own
interests; the US crushes democracy in these countries. The Obama-Biden
administration, showing weakness on its democratic values in Egypt, surrendered
democracy in Egypt to the idiot Netanyahu. America should have defended its
core democratic values in Egypt at all costs.
.jpg)
